The BlogMartha CoakleyPoliticsMassachusetts

Test Your Understanding of American Politics

Maybe I'm missing something, but I think there are only three explanations for Scott Brown's Tuesday victory over Martha Coakley.
By 

Author, columnist, radio host, television commentator and consultant

Author, columnist, radio host, television commentator and consultant
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

Given:

  • Massachusetts' bipartisan health care reform a few years ago is the model for what Obama and the Democrats have been on the verge of passing in Washington.

  • Scott Brown supported the bipartisan Massachusetts health care reform (which has given the state near-universal coverage)

  • Scott Brown opposes the Democrats' health care reform in Washington, and told voters he'd be the 41st vote to stop it.

  • Massachusetts voters, who overwhelmingly support the Massachusetts health care reform, have sent Scott Brown to Washington to stop Washington from enacting at a national level the popular plan Massachusetts enacted a few years ago.

    • Which of the following explains Scott Brown's victory over Martha Coakley? (Maybe I'm missing something, but I think these are the only three options):

    1) Scott Brown is a disingenuous idiot.

    2) Massachusetts voters are confused idiots.

    3) I'm an idiot, for expecting logic or reason to play any role in American political life at all.

    |
    Submit a tip

    Popular in the Community

    Close

    What's Hot